Skip to content

More accurate lint source location data; highlight/fail on deprecated terms#62

Closed
rvedotrc wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ridiculous-hack
Closed

More accurate lint source location data; highlight/fail on deprecated terms#62
rvedotrc wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
ridiculous-hack

Conversation

@rvedotrc

@rvedotrc rvedotrc commented May 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reports deprecated terms in markdown text (not code blocks, and not link targets), with nice accurate source code locations :-)

Matches on class are not "fatal", i.e. not sufficient to fail the build, because there will be so many false positives.

I have no idea if all this is even slightly useful.

@rvedotrc rvedotrc changed the title More accurate lint source location data More accurate lint source location data; highlight/fail on deprecated terms May 8, 2025
@rvedotrc rvedotrc force-pushed the ridiculous-hack branch from bae8bd0 to c76efb1 Compare May 8, 2025 06:36
@adamblanchard

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Useful POC. It would be nice if we could have this as part of linting. Not sure how practical it is with the false positives. Is it possible to somehow mark "ignore" on certain linting issues if it is a false positive? 🤔

I'm going to close this PR for now as part of tidying up open PRs, but it's a useful reference we can come back if we decide to try the idea.

@rvedotrc rvedotrc deleted the ridiculous-hack branch October 15, 2025 05:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants